From the essential Alex Himelfarb, another beautifully written and persuasively argued essay detailing everything wrong with both the omnibus crime legislation and the nasty, vindictive and short-sighted sentiments behind it.
It's sadly ironic, he writes, that the Conservatives are moving this way just as U.S. jurisdictions are abandoning the "tough on crime" model, given all the evidence of how ineffective and counterproductive it is, and citing the contrast with what's traditionally been seen as a more humane and flexible approach in Canada – one which didn't compromise public safety.
wibiya widget
Showing posts with label Alex Himelfarb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Himelfarb. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Harper's "tough on crime" bill: meaner, more expensive, and not making us any safer
Monday, November 22, 2010
The essential Alex Himelfarb
Is it possible, from a legislative point of view, to declare this man an essential resource, indispensible to the national interest? In a new post on our dysfunctional democratic institutions, he writes:
He's probably a lot kinder to Bob Rae than I'd be, but that's because he's a gentleman.
The new populism we see developing to the South is profoundly undemocratic. Giving up on the possibility of collective progress leads not to democracy making but to institution busting, not to open knowledge sharing and public education, essential to democracy, but to the denigration of knowledge and expertise and surrender to slogans and spin, and, despite the rhetoric, not to greater personal freedom, except for the already rich and powerful.
He's probably a lot kinder to Bob Rae than I'd be, but that's because he's a gentleman.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Too much snark, not enough cerebral
Mea culpa. While I'm tossing off cheap shots (well-deserved cheap shots, mind) at Toronto's mayoral candidates, someone else is actually taking the time to craft thoughtful and reflective stuff.
Another quiet, persuasive and on-the-money post from the indispensable Alex Himelfarb. What are we supposed to do when the government is bent on dividing us, on manipulating us, on exploiting our resentment, and on keeping us fearful and ignorant? A taste:
Another quiet, persuasive and on-the-money post from the indispensable Alex Himelfarb. What are we supposed to do when the government is bent on dividing us, on manipulating us, on exploiting our resentment, and on keeping us fearful and ignorant? A taste:
How will any of this make us safer, more prosperous, healthier? How will any of this help us address the challenges of an aging population, deepening inequality and poverty, climate change and environmental degradation, a widening productivity gap? Feeding and feeding off anger and distrust is easy but just where does it take us?Go and read it now.
Labels:
Alex Himelfarb,
civil society,
cynicism,
divisiveness,
Harper,
rebuilding trust
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)